CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Naka, Ibaraki

city in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ633647 ↗
Source-derived summary

Naka (那珂市, Naka-shi) is a city located in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. As of 1 July 2020, the city had an estimated population of 53,153 in 20,953 households and a population density of 543.4 persons per km2. The percentage of the population aged over 65 was 32.4%. The total area of the city is 97.82 square kilometres (37.77 sq mi).

Geography

Naka is located in north-central Ibaraki Prefecture, with the Naka River and Kuji River flowing through the city.

Surrounding municipalities

Ibaraki Prefecture

Hitachi

Hitachinaka

Hitachiōmiya

Hitachiōta

Mito

Shirosato

Tōkai

Demographics

Per Japanese census data, the population of Naka peaked around the year 2000 and has declined slightly since.

History

On March 31, 1955 the town of Sugaya and villages of Godai, Nakata, Kanzaki, Toda, Yoshino and Kizaki were merged to become the town of Naka (within Naka District). The town was the 4th largest population within the prefecture, following the town of Kamisu (from Kashima District), the town of Sōwa (from Sashima District), and the town of Ami (from Inashiki District).

On January 21, 2005 Naka absorbed the town of Urizura (from Naka District) to become the city of Naka.

Government

Naka has a mayor-council form of government with a directly elected mayor and a unicameral city council of 18 members.

Editorial summary

“Naka, Ibaraki” enters the record as city in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Naka, Ibaraki and city can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA valuable geographic starting point for tracing changing names, boundaries, uses and administrative responsibility. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2020, 2000, 1955, 2005—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1955-03-31, 2005-01-21—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Naka, Ibaraki and city.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Naka, Ibaraki” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Naka, Ibaraki and city provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q633647. VIAF identifies the subject as 260069315. Authority coordinates are 36.457, 140.487. 2 of 6 selected statements include explicit references; 2 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2020, 2000, 1955 and 2005.

Critical limits

Architectural summaries often privilege surviving fabric and can understate demolished phases, contested use or displaced communities. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Naka, Ibaraki”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Naka, Ibaraki primary sources, Naka, Ibaraki archive and Naka research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Naka, Ibaraki”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Naka, Ibaraki” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.