Gyuwon sahwa
Korean literary work

The Gyuwon sahwa (Korean: 규원사화) is a forged text from the early twentieth century, claiming to be a history written in 1675 that describes ancient Korean history.
Authenticity
The existence of the book is first recorded in 1925.
In 2017, South Korean historian Cho In-sung writes:
"The debate over authenticity [of the Gyuwon sahwa] may be said to be already over... The Gyuwon sahwa is a hoax made after 1914."
Evidence for the Gyuwon sahwa's lack of authenticity includes:
The work includes a dating error found in a text published in 1823, in which a quotation from the Goryeosa about an event that occurred in the tenth regnal year of Seongjong of Goryeo is misattributed to the tenth regnal year of Gwangjong of Goryeo. This suggests that the Gyuwon sahwa copied from the 1823 text.
The work uses the word 文化 munhwa in the sense of the Western term "culture," which is a wasei-kango invented in nineteenth-century Japan and not found in Korea before the twentieth century.
The seventh-century reign of Queen Seondeok is said to have been "a thousand and several hundred years ago."
Neither the work nor any of its content is found in anthologies of Dangun-related information published by Daejongists in 1913 and 1921.
The aforementioned 1914 Daejongist anthology included a text written by the Japanese army in 1889, but mistranslated a line. The identical mistranslated line is found in the Gyuwon sahwa, suggesting that the latter's authors copied from the 1914 translation of an 1889 Japanese source.
The work contains content and rhetoric very similar to those found in articles published in 1924 and 1925 by the nationalist historian Sin Chae-ho.
“Gyuwon sahwa” enters the record as korean literary work. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Gyuwon, sahwa and Korean can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Gyuwon sahwa” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Gyuwon, sahwa and Korean provides the most credible route into that argument.
Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q711823. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1675, 1925, 2017 and 1914.
Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.
- Identifying works and editions
- Tracing reception history
- Finding collection records
The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Gyuwon sahwa”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Gyuwon sahwa primary sources, Gyuwon sahwa archive and Gyuwon research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gyuwon sahwa”?
- How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
- Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Gyuwon sahwa” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.