CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Beijing–Qinhuangdao railway

railway line

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 10, 2024
Entity authorityQ825804 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Beijing–Qinhuangdao railway, also known as the Jingqin Line (simplified Chinese: 京秦铁路; traditional Chinese: 京秦鐵路; pinyin: jīngqín tiělù) is a branch railway which connects the capital of China, Beijing, with the coastal city of Qinhuangdao. The railway spans a total of 294 kilometres (183 mi) and has a total of nine stations in Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei Province.

History

The Jingqin railway was built from 1982 to 1985 with development assistance financing from Japan.

Cities

The railway passes through the following cities:

Beijing (北京市)

Tianjin (天津市)

Hebei: Tangshan (唐山市), Qinhuangdao (秦皇岛)

Connecting railways

After departing the Beijing railway station, the line branches off to form the Beijing–Shanhaiguan railway, a railway which ends at the Shanhaiguan District of Qinhuangdao. Also in the urban area of Beijing, the line intersects with both Beijing–Baotou and Fengtai–Shacheng railways. The line then breaks off again to form the Beijing–Chengde railway to the north. The railway is also one of the three lines which comprise the Beijing–Harbin railway. The Datong–Qinhuangdao Railway also intersects with the Beijing–Qinhuangdao line in Beijing.

In Tianjin, the line crosses with the Tianjin–Jizhou railway. Then in Harbin the line intersects with the Tangshan–Zunhua railway before crossing over a few times with the Beijing–Shanhaiguan railway.

Editorial summary

“Beijing–Qinhuangdao railway” enters the record as railway line. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Beijing, Qinhuangdao and railway can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1982, 1985—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Beijing, Qinhuangdao and railway.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Beijing–Qinhuangdao railway” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Beijing, Qinhuangdao and railway provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 10, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q825804. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1982 and 1985.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Beijing–Qinhuangdao railway”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Beijing–Qinhuangdao railway primary sources, Beijing–Qinhuangdao railway archive and Beijing research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Beijing–Qinhuangdao railway”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Beijing–Qinhuangdao railway” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.