CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Mong Yawng Yazawin

19th-century Burmese chronicle

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 20, 2024
Entity authorityQ16999240 ↗
Source-derived summary

Mong Yawng Yazawin (Burmese: မိုင်းယောင်း ရာဇဝင်, lit. 'Chronicle of Mong Yawng') is a 19th-century Burmese chronicle that covers the history of the Shan state of Mong Yawng. It is believed to have been written after the publication of Hmannan Yazawin.

References

Bibliography

Cochrane, W.W. (1915). The Shans. Vol. 1. Yangon: Superintendent, Government Printing.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Mong Yawng Yazawin” is 19th-century Burmese chronicle. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Mong, Yawng and Yazawin, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1915—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Mong, Yawng and Yazawin is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “19th-century Burmese chronicle” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 20, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q16999240. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1915.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mong Yawng Yazawin”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mong Yawng Yazawin primary sources, Mong Yawng Yazawin archive and Mong research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mong Yawng Yazawin”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Mong Yawng Yazawin” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.