CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Malkot (Judaism)

Type of flagellation and punishment mentioned in the Torah

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ107506993 ↗
Source-derived summary

Malkot (Hebrew: מלקות, lit. 'whipping'), sometimes translated as "flogging" or "lashes", is a type of flagellation, and a punishment mentioned in the Torah. The punishment was given to Jews who violated one of Mitzvah's lo te'aseh bemeizid.

The laws of Malkot can be found in Masekhet Makkot.

Torah

Malkot originates as a form of court-administered punishment in Deuteronomy 25:1–3:

When people have a dispute, they are to take it to court and the judges will decide the case, acquitting the innocent and condemning the guilty. If the guilty person deserves to be beaten, the judge shall make them lie down and have them flogged in his presence with the number of lashes the crime deserves, but the judge must not impose more than forty lashes. If the guilty party is flogged more than that, your fellow Israelite will be degraded in your eyes.In the text, a judge may impose up to forty stripes as punishment, but no more, explicitly to preserve the offender's dignity. This reflects an ethical concern that an offender remain "your brother" – i.e. a fellow Israelite – and not be dehumanized by excessive beating. Biblical law envisioned flogging as a corrective measure rather than vengeance, even describing God as disciplining Israel "as a man chastises his son". Aside from a specific case (a slanderer of a virgin, who is fined and flogged per Deut.

Editorial summary

“Malkot (Judaism)” enters the record as type of flagellation and punishment mentioned in the Torah. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Malkot, Judaism and Type can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 228-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Malkot, Judaism and Type.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Malkot (Judaism)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Malkot, Judaism and Type provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q107506993. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Malkot (Judaism)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Malkot (Judaism) primary sources, Malkot (Judaism) archive and Malkot research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Malkot (Judaism)”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Malkot (Judaism)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.