CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Lily Pereg

microbial ecologist (1964-2019)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ61046604 ↗
Source-derived summary

Lily Pereg (Hebrew: לילי פרג; 1964–2019) was an Australian microbiologist who was born in Israel. She completed a bachelor's degree at Ben Gurion University and a master's degree at Tel Aviv University. She moved to Australia in the 1990s to undertake a PhD at the University of Sydney, which she completed in 1998. Following this, she completed a Postdoctoral Research Fellowship at the University of Cologne, Germany. In May 2001, Pereg took up an appointment in the School of Science and Technology at the University of New England, where she was promoted to Professor of Microbiology in 2018.

Pereg's research focused on soil microbial ecology and plant-microbial interactions. She taught microbiology, biochemistry and biotechnology at the University of New England. Pereg was an active member in the European Geosciences Union community since 2013, having been executive editor of SOIL, an EGU and Copernicus open access journal in 2014, and receiving the Soil System Sciences Division (SSS) Best Convener award for her work in 2015. She became chair of the SSS Division Soil Biology, Microbiology and Biodiversity Subdivision in 2016, and was elected as President of the European Geosciences Union SSS Division in Autumn 2017, a position she was due to take up in April 2019.

Pereg and her sister were found dead in Mendoza, Argentina, in January 2019, presumed to have been murdered by Pereg's nephew.

Editorial summary

“Lily Pereg” enters the record as microbial ecologist (1964-2019). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Lily, Pereg and microbial can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1964, 2019, 1998, 2001—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1964. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Lily, Pereg and microbial.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Lily Pereg” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Lily, Pereg and microbial provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q61046604. VIAF identifies the subject as 91529753. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1964, 2019, 1998 and 2001.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lily Pereg”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lily Pereg primary sources, Lily Pereg archive and Lily research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lily Pereg”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Lily Pereg” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.