CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Umar Dzhabrailov

Russian politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ4159652 ↗
Source-derived summary

Umar Aliyevich Dzhabrailov (Russian: Умар Алиевич Джабраилов; 28 June 1958 – 2 March 2026) was a Russian businessman and politician of Chechen descent, who served as the representative to the Federation Council of Russia from the executive body of the Chechen Republic (2004–2009). He also was the vice-president of the Artists Union of Russia, a member of the Russian delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, and as an advisor to Sergei Prikhodko, the Assistant to the President of Russia.

Early life and career

From 1973 to 1977, Dzhabrailov studied at the Rospotrebsoyuz College in Moscow. From 1977 to 1979, he served in the Soviet Army in the Strategic Missile Forces in Korosten in Ukraine, holding the rank of Captain. In 1985, Dzhabrailov graduated with honors from the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In 1989, he became general director of LLP "Danako". In the mid 1990s, he was involved in the killing of his American business partner, Paul Tatum; the killing was because of a series of disagreements over the Radisson Hotel.

Dzhabraliov was a candidate in the 2000 Russian presidential election.

In 2001, he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of First Mutual Credit Society Bank. From 2001 to 2004, he was a President of the "Group Plaza”.

Editorial summary

“Umar Dzhabrailov” enters the record as russian politician. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Umar, Dzhabrailov and Russian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1958, 2026, 2004, 2009—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1958-06-28. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Umar, Dzhabrailov and Russian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Umar Dzhabrailov” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Umar, Dzhabrailov and Russian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4159652. VIAF identifies the subject as 310665609. The Library of Congress control number is no2014108801. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1958, 2026, 2004 and 2009.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Umar Dzhabrailov”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Umar Dzhabrailov primary sources, Umar Dzhabrailov archive and Umar research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Umar Dzhabrailov”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Umar Dzhabrailov” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.