Non-integer base of numeration
Open-knowledge reference entry

A non-integer representation uses non-integer numbers as the radix, or base, of a positional numeral system. For a non-integer radix β > 1, the value of
x
=
d
n
…
d
2
d
1
d
0
.
d
−
1
d
−
2
…
d
−
m
{\displaystyle x=d_{n}\dots d_{2}d_{1}d_{0}.d_{-1}d_{-2}\dots d_{-m}}
is
x
=
β
n
d
n
+
⋯
+
β
2
d
2
+
β
d
1
+
d
0
+
β
−
1
d
−
1
+
β
−
2
d
−
2
+
⋯
+
β
−
m
d
−
m
.
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x&=\beta ^{n}d_{n}+\cdots +\beta ^{2}d_{2}+\beta d_{1}+d_{0}\\&\qquad +\beta ^{-1}d_{-1}+\beta ^{-2}d_{-2}+\cdots +\beta ^{-m}d_{-m}.\end{aligned}}}
The numbers di are non-negative integers less than β. This is also known as a β-expansion, a notion introduced by Rényi (1957) and first studied in detail by Parry (1960). Every real number has at least one (possibly infinite) β-expansion. The set of all β-expansions that have a finite representation is a subset of the ring Z[β, β−1].
There are applications of β-expansions in coding theory and models of quasicrystals.
Construction
β-expansions are a generalization of decimal expansions. While infinite decimal expansions are not unique (for example, 1.000...
“Non-integer base of numeration” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Non-integer, base and numeration can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Non-integer base of numeration” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Non-integer, base and numeration provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6161486. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1957 and 1960.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Non-integer base of numeration”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Non-integer base of numeration primary sources, Non-integer base of numeration archive and Non-integer research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Non-integer base of numeration”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Non-integer base of numeration” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.