CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

BOHH

pharmaceutical compound

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ140312738 ↗
Source-derived summary

BOHH, also known as 3,4-methylenedioxy-β-hydroxyphenethylamine or as β-hydroxy-MDPEA, is a chemical compound of the phenethylamine, MDxx, and BOx families related to 3,4-methylenedioxyphenethylamine (MDPEA). It is the β-hydroxy derivative of MDPEA and the β-O-desmethyl analogue of BOH (β-methoxy-MDPEA). The drug is also the 3,4-methylenedioxy analogue of the neurotransmitter norepinephrine.

According to Alexander Shulgin in his book Phenethylamines I Have Known and Loved (PiHKAL) and other publications, BOHH is inactive at doses of up to 100 mg orally. On the other hand, Michael Valentine Smith claimed in his book Psychedelic Chemistry that BOHH "is said to be a very fine trip", with no other information provided.

BOHH was first described in the scientific literature by at least 1981. Subsequently, it was described in greater detail by Shulgin in PiHKAL in 1991.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “BOHH” is pharmaceutical compound. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through BOHH, pharmaceutical and compound, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1981, 1991—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, BOHH, pharmaceutical and compound is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “pharmaceutical compound” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q140312738. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1981 and 1991.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “BOHH”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow BOHH primary sources, BOHH archive and BOHH research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “BOHH”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “BOHH” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.