CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Sârbi, Bihor

commune in Bihor County, Romania

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ16439300 ↗
Source-derived summary

Sârbi (Hungarian: Alsótótfalu) is a commune in Bihor County, Crișana, Romania with a population of 2,345 people (2021). It is composed of seven villages: Almașu Mic (Szalárdalmás), Burzuc (Borszeg), Chioag (Kővág), Fegernic (Almásfegyvernek), Fegernicu Nou (Újfegyvernek), Sarcău (Szarkó) and Sârbi.

The oldest attested names for Fegernicu are Fegwernuk (1077-1097) and Olwar (1266).

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Sârbi, Bihor” as commune in Bihor County, Romania. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Sârbi, Bihor and commune.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2021, 1077, 1097, 1266—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Sârbi, Bihor and commune providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Sârbi, Bihor”, the useful work is to connect “commune in Bihor County, Romania” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16439300. Authority coordinates are 47.177, 22.133. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2021, 1077, 1097 and 1266.

Critical limits

Architectural summaries often privilege surviving fabric and can understate demolished phases, contested use or displaced communities. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sârbi, Bihor”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sârbi, Bihor primary sources, Sârbi, Bihor archive and Sârbi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sârbi, Bihor”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Sârbi, Bihor” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.