Daher al-Umar
Ottoman Pasha (1689/90–1775)

Daher al-Umar al-Zaydani, alternatively spelled Zahir al-Umar or Dahir al-Umar (Arabic: ظاهر العمر الزيداني, romanized: Ẓāhir al-ʿUmar az-Zaydānī, 1689/90 – 21 or 22 August 1775), was the paramount sheikh of the Zayadina family and ruler of northern Palestine from the 1730s until his death in 1775, during Ottoman rule. At his zenith in 1774, he controlled the Syrian coast from Jaffa to Sidon, though formal recognition of his status was limited to that of a multazim (tax farmer).
In 1730, Daher took over Tiberias and by c. 1740, Safed and Nazareth. He and his family fortified these towns and other Galilee villages, most notably Deir Hanna, helping them withstand sieges by the governor of Damascus, Sulayman Pasha al-Azm, in 1742–1743. By then, Daher controlled the area's cotton crop and eventually monopolized its high-demand trade with the French, amassing substantial wealth. In 1750, he made the outlet of this trade, the ruined port village of Acre, into his capital, developing it into Syria's third largest city. He expanded into Haifa and its environs in the 1760s, bringing him into conflict with the governor of Damascus, Uthman Pasha al-Kurji. Daher allied with Egypt's mamluk ruler, Ali Bey, and the Shias of southern Lebanon. Their military campaigns ousted Uthman Pasha and his son from Damascus and Sidon, culminating with Daher's victory at Lake Hula and occupation of Sidon in 1771.
Daher's fortunes turned in 1772 with the ouster of Ali Bey by his deputy Abu al-Dhahab.
The public source identifies “Daher al-Umar” as ottoman Pasha (1689/90–1775). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Daher, al-Umar and Ottoman.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Daher al-Umar”, the useful work is to connect “ottoman Pasha (1689/90–1775)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1207512. VIAF identifies the subject as 50023609. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1689, 1775, 1774 and 1730.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Daher al-Umar”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Daher al-Umar primary sources, Daher al-Umar archive and Daher research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Daher al-Umar”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Daher al-Umar” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.