"Honorary Protestants"
2015 non-fiction book by David Fraser

"Honorary Protestants": The Jewish School Question in Montreal, 1867-1997 is a 2015 non-fiction book by David Fraser, published by University of Toronto Press. It is about the ways Jewish residents of Montreal negotiated the K-12 educational environment in the city; in the time period scope of the book, public schools were either Catholic or Protestant and divided into school districts along those lines instead of along linguistic lines.
The title originates from a statement in A Meeting of the People: School Boards and Protestant Communities in Quebec, 1801-1998 about how Jewish K-12 students typically attended Protestant schools by custom.
Background
David Fraser works for the University of Nottingham as a professor, with his field being law and social theory.
Content
The book has fourteen chapters:
Introduction: Constituting Law, Constituting Justice in the Jewish School Question
Invoking Equality, Invoking Legality: Jews Constituting Their Canadian Identity
Schools, Taxes, Jews, Catholics (and Protestants): The Origins of the Jewish School Question
Jews and Roman Catholics, School Taxes and Protestants: The First Jewish School Question
Taxes, the Rabbi, and the Schoolboy: Section 93 and the Pinsler Case
Promises, Promises: “Honorary Protestants” in Protestant Schools
Jews, Protestants, and Taxes (Again): The Jewish School Question in the 1920s
Jews, Protestants, Roman Catholics, and the Law: The Jewish School Question Goes to Court
Jews, Protestants, and Roman Catholics: Two Crises and the Jewish School Question, 1928–1931
The Protestant Jews of Ste Sophie and La Macaza: Constituting School and Community in Rural Quebec
Outremont and Beyond: The Jewish School Question Moves West
Hampstead and Beyond: From the Ghetto to Citizenship and Equality under Law’s Shadow
TMR, St Laurent, Côte Saint-Luc: Democracy, Law, and the End of the Jewish School Question
Constituting Canada and the Jewish School Question in Montreal, fin
The book has information on Jewish Canadians trying to get rights to for education and representation on boards of trustees of school districts.
Reception
Jory Binder, a Juris Doctor candidate of Osgoode Hall Law School, wrote that the "contextual stance on the rule of law" is the primary "contribution" of the work, and that the historical developments are "skilfully" explained.
Anthony Di Masco of Bishop's University described the book as "a valuable new contribution to" its field.
David S. Koffman of York University wrote that of what the book covers, the "scholarship is meticulous and unassailable"; Koffman stated that he wished that the book covered some other related aspects.
Roderick MacLeod, who co-wrote A Meeting of the People, argued that "Honorary Protestants" has "the lack of a sense of human agency" - that is, not showing how individuals felt/acted, as its "real shortcoming", and MacLeod also criticized "errors and confusing passages". MacLeod did not like how he perceived the use of the title "Honorary Protestants" as being "sarcastically" done.
The public source identifies “"Honorary Protestants"” as 2015 non-fiction book by David Fraser. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Honorary, Protestants and non-fiction.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “"Honorary Protestants"”, the useful work is to connect “2015 non-fiction book by David Fraser” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q139770065. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1867, 1997, 2015 and 1801.
Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.
- Identifying works and editions
- Tracing reception history
- Finding collection records
The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “"Honorary Protestants"”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow "Honorary Protestants" primary sources, "Honorary Protestants" archive and Honorary research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “"Honorary Protestants"”?
- How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
- Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “"Honorary Protestants"” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.