CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Zoufftgen

commune in Moselle, France

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ22011
Source-derived summary

Zoufftgen (French pronunciation: [zufgən]; German: Suftgen; Luxembourgish: Suuftgen [ˈzuːftɕən] ) is a commune in the Moselle department in Grand Est in north-eastern France.

Population

2006 rail crash

On the morning of 11 October 2006 a passenger train and a goods train collided head-on, killing six people.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Zoufftgen” as commune in Moselle, France. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Zoufftgen, commune and Moselle can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as commune in Moselle, France. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q22011. VIAF identifies the subject as 245874901. Authority coordinates are 49.462, 6.133. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2006.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Zoufftgen”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Zoufftgen primary sources, Zoufftgen archive and Zoufftgen research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Zoufftgen”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Zoufftgen” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.