CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Chinese Century

neologism suggesting that China may dominate the 21st century geoeconomically or geopolitically

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ3123574 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Chinese Century (simplified Chinese: 中国世纪; traditional Chinese: 中國世紀; pinyin: Zhōngguó shìjì) is a neologism suggesting that the 21st century may be geoeconomically and/or geopolitically dominated by the People's Republic of China, similar to how the "American Century" refers to the 20th century and the "British Century" to the 19th. The phrase is used particularly in association with the idea that the economy of China may overtake the economy of the United States to be the largest in the world. A similar term is China's rise or rise of China (simplified Chinese: 中国崛起; traditional Chinese: 中國崛起; pinyin: Zhōngguó juéqǐ). Inside Mainland China, the concept is more often described as the re-rise of China or rejuvenation of China (simplified Chinese: 中华复兴; traditional Chinese: 中華復興), viewing it as a rightful return of China to its millennia-long status as a leading civilizational state, evident by the "great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation" slogan coined in 2001 by paramount leader Jiang Zemin.

China created the Belt and Road Initiative, which, according to analysts, has been a geostrategic effort to take a larger role in global affairs and challenge American postwar hegemony. It has also been argued that China co-founded the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and New Development Bank to compete with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund in development finance. In 2015, China launched the Made in China 2025 strategic plan to further develop its manufacturing sector. There have been debates on the effectiveness and practicality of these programs in promoting China's global status.

China's emergence as a global economic power is tied to its large working population. However, the population in China is aging faster than almost any other country in history.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Chinese Century” is neologism suggesting that China may dominate the 21st century geoeconomically or geopolitically. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Chinese, Century and neologism, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2001, 2015, 2025—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Chinese, Century and neologism is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “neologism suggesting that China may dominate the 21st century geoeconomically or geopolitically” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3123574. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2001, 2015 and 2025.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chinese Century”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chinese Century primary sources, Chinese Century archive and Chinese research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chinese Century”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Chinese Century” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.