Zhong Feng Wang
Open-knowledge reference entry
Zhong Feng Wang received his BS and MSEE degrees both from Tsinghua University, Beijing. He obtained the Ph.D. degree from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, in 2000. He worked for many years at Nanjing University, China, as a Distinguished Professor since 2016. Previously he worked for Broadcom Corporation, California, from 2007 to 2016 as a technical director. Even earlier, he worked for National Semiconductor Corporation and Oregon State University successively.
He is a world-recognized expert on Low-Power/High-Speed VLSI Design for Signal Processing Systems. He has published over 400 technical papers with numerous best paper awards received from IEEE major conferences and transactions, including the Circuits and Systems Society (CASS) VLSI Transactions Best Paper Award in 2007. He has served as associate editor for a few transactions of IEEE with multiple terms and served as various chairs or TPC member for tens of IEEE conferences. In addition, he has deeply participated in many commercial chip designs and has filed over 100 patent applications with tens of them granted in either USA or China. Meanwhile, he has contributed significantly to the industrial standards.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Zhong Feng Wang” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Zhong, Feng and Wang, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q29342509. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000, 2016 and 2007.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Zhong Feng Wang”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Zhong Feng Wang primary sources, Zhong Feng Wang archive and Zhong research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Zhong Feng Wang”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Zhong Feng Wang” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.