CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Yu Guangzhou

Chinese politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 26, 2025
Entity authorityQ8290081
Source-derived summary

Yu Guangzhou (Chinese: 于广洲; born January 1953) is a retired politician of the People's Republic of China.

Career

Yu served as Minister of the General Administration of Customs from April 2011 to March 2018. Prior to that, he served as Mayor of Wuxi (1993–1997) and Xuzhou (1997–2000) in Jiangsu province, Vice Governor of Jiangsu (2000–2001), Vice Minister of Commerce (2003–2008), and Chinese Communist Party Deputy Committee Secretary of Fujian province (2009–2011).

Yu was a member of the 18th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Yu Guangzhou” is chinese politician. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Guangzhou, Chinese and politician, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1953, 2011, 2018, 1993—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1953-01-01. For this dossier, Guangzhou, Chinese and politician is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “chinese politician” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 26, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q8290081. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1953, 2011, 2018 and 1993.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Yu Guangzhou”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Yu Guangzhou primary sources, Yu Guangzhou archive and Guangzhou research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Yu Guangzhou”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Yu Guangzhou” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.