CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Young–Laplace equation

describing pressure difference over an interface in fluid mechanics

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 20, 2026
Entity authorityQ905258 ↗
Source-derived summary

In physics, the Young–Laplace equation () is an equation that describes the capillary pressure difference sustained across the interface between two static fluids, such as water and air, due to the phenomenon of surface tension or wall tension acting against the curvature of the surface (although use of the latter is only applicable if assuming that the wall is very thin).

The Young–Laplace equation relates the pressure difference to the shape of the surface or wall and it is fundamentally important in the study of static capillary surfaces. It is a statement of normal stress balance for static fluids meeting at an interface, where the interface is treated as a surface (zero thickness):

Δ

p

=

−

γ

∇

⋅

n

^

=

−

2

γ

H

f

=

−

γ

(

1

R

1

+

1

R

2

)

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\Delta p&=-\gamma \nabla \cdot {\hat {n}}\\&=-2\gamma H_{f}\\&=-\gamma \left({\frac {1}{R_{1}}}+{\frac {1}{R_{2}}}\right)\end{aligned}}}

where

Δ

p

{\displaystyle \Delta p}

is the Laplace pressure, the pressure difference across the fluid interface (the exterior pressure minus the interior pressure),

γ

{\displaystyle \gamma }

is the surface tension (or wall tension),

n

^

{\displaystyle {\hat {n}}}

is the unit normal pointing out of the surface,

H

f

{\displaystyle H_{f}}

is the mean curvature, and

R

1

{\displaystyle R_{1}}

and

R

2

{\displaystyle R_{2}}

are the principal radii of curvature. Note that only normal stress is considered, because a static interface is possible only in the absence of tangential stress.

The equation is named after Thomas Young, who developed the qualitative theory of surface tension in 1805, and Pierre-Simon Laplace who completed the mathematical description in the following year. It is sometimes also called the Young–Laplace–Gauss equation, as Carl Friedrich Gauss unified the work of Young and Laplace in 1830, deriving both the differential equation and boundary conditions using Johann Bernoulli's virtual work principles.

Soap films

If the pressure difference is zero, as in a soap film without gravity, the interface will assume the shape of a minimal surface.

Emulsions

The equation also explains the energy required to create an emulsion. To form the small, highly curved droplets of an emulsion, extra energy is required to overcome the large pressure that results from their small radius.

The Laplace pressure, which is greater for smaller droplets, causes the diffusion of molecules out of the smallest droplets in an emulsion and drives emulsion coarsening via Ostwald ripening.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Young–Laplace equation” as describing pressure difference over an interface in fluid mechanics. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1805, 1830—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Young, Laplace and equation can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as describing pressure difference over an interface in fluid mechanics. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q905258. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1805 and 1830.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Young–Laplace equation”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Young–Laplace equation primary sources, Young–Laplace equation archive and Young research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Young–Laplace equation”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Young–Laplace equation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.