CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Young Progressives

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ62626282 ↗
Source-derived summary

Young Progressive Slovakia (Slovak: Mladé Progresívne Slovensko, mPS) is a social liberal youth organization in Slovakia connected to the political party Progressive Slovakia.

History

Young Progressives was founded in 2018. Since 2023, the organization has been a full member of the European Liberal Youth and an associate member of the International Federation of Liberal Youth.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Young Progressives” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Young, Progressives and Open-knowledge.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2018, 2023—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2018. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Young, Progressives and Open-knowledge providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Young Progressives”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q62626282. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2018 and 2023.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Young Progressives”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Young Progressives primary sources, Young Progressives archive and Young research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Young Progressives”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Young Progressives” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.