Yetter–Drinfeld category
braided monoidal category of modules over a Hopf algebra

In mathematics a Yetter–Drinfeld category is a special type of braided monoidal category. It consists of modules over a Hopf algebra which satisfy some additional axioms.
Definition
Let H be a Hopf algebra over a field k. Let
Δ
{\displaystyle \Delta }
denote the coproduct and S the antipode of H. Let V be a vector space over k. Then V is called a (left left) Yetter–Drinfeld module over H if
(
V
,
.
)
{\displaystyle (V,{\boldsymbol {.}})}
is a left H-module, where
.
:
H
⊗
V
→
V
{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {.}}:H\otimes V\to V}
denotes the left action of H on V,
(
V
,
δ
)
{\displaystyle (V,\delta \;)}
is a left H-comodule, where
δ
:
V
→
H
⊗
V
{\displaystyle \delta :V\to H\otimes V}
denotes the left coaction of H on V,
the maps
.
{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {.}}}
and
δ
{\displaystyle \delta }
satisfy the compatibility condition
δ
(
h
.
v
)
=
h
(
1
)
v
(
−
1
)
S
(
h
(
3
)
)
⊗
h
(
2
)
.
v
(
0
)
{\displaystyle \delta (h{\boldsymbol {.}}v)=h_{(1)}v_{(-1)}S(h_{(3)})\otimes h_{(2)}{\boldsymbol {.}}v_{(0)}}
for all
h
∈
H
,
v
∈
V
{\displaystyle h\in H,v\in V}
,
where, using Sweedler notation,
(
Δ
⊗
i
d
)
Δ
(
h
)
=
h
(
1
)
⊗
h
(
2
)
⊗
h
(
3
)
∈
H
⊗
H
⊗
H
{\displaystyle (\Delta \otimes \mathrm {id} )\Delta (h)=h_{(1)}\otimes h_{(2)}\otimes h_{(3)}\in H\otimes H\otimes H}
denotes the twofold coproduct of
h
∈
H
{\displaystyle h\in H}
, and
δ
(
v
)
=
v
(
−
1
)
⊗
v
(
0
)
{\displaystyle \delta (v)=v_{(-1)}\otimes v_{(0)}}
.
The public source identifies “Yetter–Drinfeld category” as braided monoidal category of modules over a Hopf algebra. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Yetter, Drinfeld and category.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Yetter–Drinfeld category”, the useful work is to connect “braided monoidal category of modules over a Hopf algebra” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q8053054. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Yetter–Drinfeld category”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Yetter–Drinfeld category primary sources, Yetter–Drinfeld category archive and Yetter research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Yetter–Drinfeld category”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Yetter–Drinfeld category” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.