CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Yang Mai

Chinese diplomat (born 1923)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ11102172
Source-derived summary

Yang Mai (Chinese: 杨迈; pinyin: Yáng Mài; born 1923) is a Chinese diplomat who represented his country as ambassador to Peru and to Guyana.

Biography

In 1946, he studied at Peking University. In 1947, he served as a member of the Standing Committee of the Human Rights Protection Committee of the North China Federation of Students. At the beginning of 1948, he served as the commander-in-chief of the joint self-defense force of teachers and students of Haidian University. In May, he left Beijing and went to the Department of Political and Educational Affairs of North China Military and Political University as a theoretical teacher. In May 1950, he was transferred to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and served as a staff member of the Cadre Education Section of the Personnel Office of the General Office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and was later promoted to deputy section chief. In 1955, the Personnel Department was upgraded to the Personnel Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. He still served as the deputy section chief of the Cadre Education Section of the Personnel Department and was later promoted to section chief. In 1960, he served as the Chief of Cuba Section of the American and Australian Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and was later assigned as the Second Secretary of the Embassy in Havana. In 1969, he worked at the Hubei Cadre School of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Yang Mai” as chinese diplomat (born 1923). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Yang, Chinese and diplomat.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1923, 1946, 1947, 1948—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1923-01-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Yang, Chinese and diplomat providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Yang Mai”, the useful work is to connect “chinese diplomat (born 1923)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q11102172. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1923, 1946, 1947 and 1948.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Yang Mai”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Yang Mai primary sources, Yang Mai archive and Yang research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Yang Mai”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Yang Mai” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.