CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

List of unclassified languages of South America

Wikimedia list article

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ6644203
Source-derived summary

The following purported languages of South America are listed as unclassified in either Campbell (2024), Loukotka (1968), Ethnologue, or Glottolog. Nearly all are extinct. It is likely that many of them were not actually distinct languages, only ethnic or regional names.

Campbell (2024)

Campbell (2024) lists the following languages of South America as unclassified. Most are extinct. Many were drawn from Loukotka (1968) and Adelaar & Muysken (2004). The majority are not listed in Ethnologue. The list is arranged in alphabetical order.

Aarufi – Colombia

Aburuñe – Bolivia; spoken near Pantanal

Acarapi – Brazil

Aconipa (Tabancale, Tabancara) – Ecuador; only 5 words known which are dissimilar to other languages

Aguano (Awano, Ahuano, Uguano, Aguanu, Santa Crucino) – Peru; completely unattested but thought to be Arawakan

Alarua – Brazil

Alon – Peru; along the Huallaga River

Amasifuin – Peru; along the Huallaga River

Amikoana (Amikuân, Amicuan) – Brazil; appears to be nonexistent and is certainly extinct now, classified by Loukotka (1968) as a Cariban language related to Wayana, Arakajú and Apalaí

Amoeca – Brazil

Amuimo – Brazil

Anetine – Bolivia

Angara – Peru

Anicum – Brazil

Anserma (including Caramanta, Cartama) – Colombia, is considered Chocoan

Aperea – Argentina

Apitupá – Brazil

Apiyipán – Bolivia

Aracadaini – Brazil

Arae – Brazil

Aramayu – Brazil

Aramurú – Brazil

Arapoá – Brazil

Ararau – Brazil

Arda – Peru, Colombia; a misidentified vocabulary and texts of the West African language Popo (Gen)

Arma (Arma-Pozo) – Colombia; known from one word only

Aroásene – Brazil

Artane – Bolivia; spoken near Pantanal

Atavila – Peru

Aticum (Araticum, Uamué) – Brazil; data from Meader (1978) likely to be faked

Atunceta (Tunceta, Atunseta) – Colombia, unclassifiable for lack of data

Aueiko – Brazil

Avis – Brazil

Ayacore – Peru

Baenan (Baenã) – Brazil; only 9 words known

Bagua – Peru; only 3 words known, thought to be Cariban and incorrectly conflated with likely related Patagón

Baixóta – Brazil

Bakurönchichi – Brazil

Barbacoas (Barbácoa, Colima) – Colombia; ISO 639 code retired in 2020 for being nonexistent

Bauá – Brazil

Bikutiakap – Brazil

Bixarenren – Brazil

Boimé (Poyme) – Brazil

Bolona – Ecuador; linked with Chicham and Cañari

Bracamoro (Papamuru) – Peru

Buritiguara – Brazil

Caapina – Brazil

Cabixi (Kabixi) - Mato Grosso, Brazil; a short word-list. The name 'Kabixí' is a generic name for any hostile group, and has been used for a number of unattested and already known languages.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “List of unclassified languages of South America” as wikimedia list article. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around List, unclassified and languages.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2024, 1968, 2004, 1978—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with List, unclassified and languages providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “List of unclassified languages of South America”, the useful work is to connect “wikimedia list article” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6644203. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2024, 1968, 2004 and 1978.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “List of unclassified languages of South America”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow List of unclassified languages of South America primary sources, List of unclassified languages of South America archive and List research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “List of unclassified languages of South America”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from List of unclassified languages of South America” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.