CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Xiong Cili

Qing dynasty politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 28, 2024
Entity authorityQ15908460 ↗
Source-derived summary

Xiong Cili (Chinese: 熊賜履‎‎; pinyin: Xióng cìlǚ; Wade–Giles: Hsiung Tz'ŭ-li, 13 December 1635 – 1709) was a Han Chinese politician, scholar, and philosopher in the Qing dynasty.

Biography

Xiong hailed from Xiaogan, Hubei. He took the imperial examination in 1657, earning a juren degree and then a jinshi degree in 1685. In 1665 he was promoted from corrector to assistant reader in the Hongwen yuan (宏文院). He then became sub-chancellor of the Guoshi yuan (國史院) in 1670 before becoming chancellor of the Hanlin Academy in the winter of that year. He was made Grand Secretary of Wuying Hall and Minister of Justice in 1675. Around this time, Xiong was also ordered to undertake various literary projects. He was given the responsibility of compiling of the imperial edicts of Taizong, the Taizong shengxun (太宗聖訓) and entrusted with reediting of the official chronicles of Taizong, the Taizong shilu (太宗實錄‎). He also was ordered to oversee the production of a work concerning the Classic of Filial Piety. However, the following year, Xiong attempted to shift blame onto a colleague for an error he committed whilst drafting an imperial rescript, resulting in his dismissal from office.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Xiong Cili” is qing dynasty politician. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Xiong, Cili and Qing, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1635, 1709, 1657, 1685—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1635. For this dossier, Xiong, Cili and Qing is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “qing dynasty politician” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 28, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q15908460. VIAF identifies the subject as 26947972. The Library of Congress control number is nr94031314. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1635, 1709, 1657 and 1685.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Xiong Cili”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Xiong Cili primary sources, Xiong Cili archive and Xiong research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Xiong Cili”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Xiong Cili” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.