CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Xiangkhouang

province of Laos

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ465947 ↗
Source-derived summary

Xiangkhouang (Lao: ຊຽງຂວາງ, meaning 'Horizontal City'), also spelled Siang Khuang, is a province of Laos on the Xiangkhoang Plateau. It has the distinction of being the most heavily bombed place on Earth. Historically, the province was formerly the independent principality of Muang Phuan. Its later capital is Phonsavan. The population of the province as of the 2015 census was 244,684. The province's Plain of Jars was designated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2019.

History

The Tai Phuan or Phuan people are a Buddhist Tai-Lao ethnic group that migrated to Laos from southern China. According to the Pongsawadan Meuang Puan ("Muang Puan Chronicles"), they were the first people who migrated in the 13th century from China to settle this province, forming the independent principality of Muang Phuan on the Plain of Jars, with Xieng Khouang (contemporary Muang Khoun) as its capital. They established an overland trade in metals and forest products with India and China; the Xieng Khouang Plateau was the center of trade for an area of upland Southeast Asia, extending as far as Da Nang in Vietnam, Samrong Sen in Cambodia, the Khorat Plateau in northeast Thailand, and the North Cachar Hills of northeastern India. In the 14th century, Muang Phuan was subsumed into the Lan Xang kingdom under King Fa Ngum.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Xiangkhouang” as province of Laos. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Xiangkhouang, province and Laos.

Editorial reviewMost useful as a place-based finding aid connecting the present description to earlier jurisdictions, maps and built evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015, 2019—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Xiangkhouang, province and Laos providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Xiangkhouang”, the useful work is to connect “province of Laos” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Maps, plans, fabric surveys and administrative records can establish how the site’s name, extent and function changed over time. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q465947. Authority coordinates are 19.417, 103.500. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2015 and 2019.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Xiangkhouang”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Xiangkhouang primary sources, Xiangkhouang archive and Xiangkhouang research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Xiangkhouang”?
  2. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
  3. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Xiangkhouang” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.