CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

ZAP Xebra

motor vehicle

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ4053516
Source-derived summary

The ZAP Xebra was an electric car launched in May 2006 in the United States market by ZAP corporation. It is classified legally as a three-wheel motorcycle in some jurisdictions, and is available in both sedan (model SD) and pickup (model PK) truck variants. It has seat belts. It does not have regenerative braking. The PK pickup has a dump bed, with fold-down sides and tailgate, that allows easy access to the batteries, controller, motor, and charger.

Although Zap listed a price for model year 2010, the Xebra was phased out after 2009. In 2013 the company was ordered to buy back all of the 2008 models that were sold and destroy them due to a failure to meet the braking requirements for a motorcycle.

Characteristics

The top speed of the Xebra is 36–40 mph (58–64 km/h), with a range of about 20–25 miles (32–40 km) with the standard batteries, or 40 miles (64 km) with the optional extended range batteries.

The sedan version had four seats and four doors, but was limited by its weight rating of 500 lb (227 kg). The listed cargo weight capacity for the PK pickup is 1,000 lb (460 kg), although PK owners in user forums report their PKs have carried more weight than that after modifications.

Editorial summary

“ZAP Xebra” enters the record as motor vehicle. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Xebra, motor and vehicle can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006, 2010, 2009, 2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Xebra, motor and vehicle.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“ZAP Xebra” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Xebra, motor and vehicle provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4053516. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2006, 2010, 2009 and 2013.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “ZAP Xebra”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow ZAP Xebra primary sources, ZAP Xebra archive and Xebra research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “ZAP Xebra”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from ZAP Xebra” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.