CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Pimelea octophylla

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 14, 2023
Entity authorityQ7194617 ↗
Source-derived summary

Pimelea octophylla, commonly known as woolly riceflower or downy riceflower, is a species of flowering plant in the family Thymelaeaceae and is endemic to south-eastern continental Australia. It is an erect shrub with densely hairy young stems, narrowly elliptic leaves and heads of 22 to 45 densely hairy, cream-coloured to pale yellow flowers surrounded by 6 to 12 leaf-like involucral bracts.

Description

Pimelea octophylla is an erect shrub that typically grows to a height of 0.4–1 m (1 ft 4 in – 3 ft 3 in) and has densely hairy young stems. Its leaves are mostly arranged alternately along the branches, narrowly elliptic, 3–18 mm (0.12–0.71 in) long and 1–6 mm (0.039–0.236 in) wide on a short petiole. The flowers are arranged on the ends of branches in compact, usually pendulous clusters of 25 to 45, sometimes up to 150, with 6 to 12 leaf-like involucral bracts 8–12 mm (0.31–0.47 in) long at the base. The flowers are cream-coloured to pale yellow, either bisexual or female, and densely hairy except at the extreme base. The floral tube is 11–14 mm (0.43–0.55 in) long, the sepals 2–5 mm (0.079–0.197 in) long and the stamens are shorter than the sepals. Flowering mainly occurs from August to February.

Taxonomy

Pimelea octophylla was first formally described in 1810 by Robert Brown in his Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae.

According to the Australian Plant Census, three former subspecies are now known as synonyms:

Pimelea octophylla subsp.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Pimelea octophylla” as species of plant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Pimelea, octophylla and species.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1810—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Pimelea, octophylla and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Pimelea octophylla”, the useful work is to connect “species of plant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 14, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q7194617. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1810.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pimelea octophylla”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pimelea octophylla primary sources, Pimelea octophylla archive and Pimelea research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pimelea octophylla”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Pimelea octophylla” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.