CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Wool Products Labeling Act

U.S. law that applies to the labeling of wool products

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ110564310 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Wool Products Labeling Act is a U.S. regulation enacted in 1939, which makes provisions for the accurate labeling of products containing wool fibers. The purpose of this act is to promote transparency and safeguard consumers and stakeholders in the wool industry from deceptive practices and false information regarding the composition of wool products in the market.

The law was also referred to as the "truth in fabrics law".

Background

The 1914 Federal Trade Commission Act aimed to promote business reform, protect consumers from deceptive advertising, and ensure transparent and honest product information from businesses. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) took notice of issues related to the advertising of wool products, including descriptive labels and visual materials.

In fall 1918, the commission lodged complaints against garment manufacturers falsely claiming their products were fully made of wool, when investigation revealed partial wool composition. One of these cases exemplifies the challenges consumers encounter when seeking to purchase an "all-wool" undergarment.

The FTC encountered numerous challenges in this regard. For instance, an undergarments manufacturer was accused of unfair competition for falsely labeling, advertising, and branding certain product lines as containing wool, despite the minimal wool content. This violation specifically contravened Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Wool Products Labeling Act” is u.S. law that applies to the labeling of wool products. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Wool, Products and Labeling, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1939, 1914, 1918—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Wool, Products and Labeling is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “u.S. law that applies to the labeling of wool products” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q110564310. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1939, 1914 and 1918.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Wool Products Labeling Act”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Wool Products Labeling Act primary sources, Wool Products Labeling Act archive and Wool research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Wool Products Labeling Act”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Wool Products Labeling Act” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.