Women in Arms
1991 film by Sergio Corbucci

Women in Arms (also known as Donne armate) is 1991 Italian television action-drama film directed by Sergio Corbucci. It was Corbucci's final work.
Plot
Nadia Cossa is a political prisoner who manages to escape during a transfer to a new prison. The young policewoman who was escorting her is suspended but starts investigating on her behalf and follows her trail.
Cast
Lina Sastri as Nadia Cossa
Cristina Marsillach as Angela Venturi
Donald Pleasence as Dreyfuss
Franco Interlenghi as the prosecutor
Massimo Bonetti as Marco La Valle
Glauco Onorato as Locasciulli
Mariangela Giordano as Miss Locasciulli
Cochi Ponzoni as Luigi Russo
Biagio Pelligra as Antonio Guidotti
Imma Piro as Angela's sister
Lucio Rosato as Luigi Cosantini
Marzio Honorato as Renzi
Vassili Karis as the killer
Arnaldo Ninchi as the blind man
Raffaella Baracchi as Cora Cardinali
Adriana Russo as Clara
Production
The film was co-produced by Fulvio Lucisano, Rai 2 and Odeon TV, marking the first co-production between RAI and a private television channel. It had a budget of about 6 billion lire.
Release
The film was broadcast on Rai 2 in two parts on 9–10 January 1991, about a month after Corbucci's death.
The public source identifies “Women in Arms” as 1991 film by Sergio Corbucci. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Women, Arms and film.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Women in Arms”, the useful work is to connect “1991 film by Sergio Corbucci” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q116867090. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1991.
Titles can refer to several editions, objects or performances, making precise identification essential before interpretation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.
- Identifying works and editions
- Tracing reception history
- Finding collection records
The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Women in Arms”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Women in Arms primary sources, Women in Arms archive and Women research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Women in Arms”?
- Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
- How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Women in Arms” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.