CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Wind and Cloud

Taiwanese TV series released in 2002

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ8023959
Source-derived summary

Wind and Cloud (風雲), also known as Fung Wan and The Storm Riders, is a Chinese–Taiwanese wuxia television series adapted from the Hong Kong manhua series Fung Wan by Ma Wing-shing. Starring Vincent Zhao and Peter Ho as the titular protagonists, the series was first broadcast in mainland China on 8 June 2002. It was followed by a 2005 sequel, Wind and Cloud 2, which was produced by a different team and starred a completely new cast (except Zhao and Ho, who reprised their roles).

Synopsis

The series follows the first two story arcs in the manhua series. Xiongba, the chief of the martial arts clan Tianxiahui, learns from the prophet Nipusa that he will rise to prominence in the wulin with the help of Wind and Cloud. By chance, he meets two boys – Nie Feng (Wind) and Bu Jingyun (Cloud) – and takes them as his apprentices.

When Nie Feng and Bu Jingyun are grown up, Nipusa reveals to Xiongba that his downfall will also be due to Wind and Cloud. To prevent the prophecy from becoming reality, Xiongba plots to turn Nie Feng and Bu Jingyun against each other, but his plan fails. Nie Feng and Bu Jingyun embark on their own journeys to mastering more powerful skills and becoming top-tier fighters in the wulin, while at the same time meeting their respective romantic partners.

At one point, Xiongba is betrayed by his followers, loses his powers, and finds himself at Bu Jingyun's mercy.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Wind and Cloud” as taiwanese TV series released in 2002. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Wind, Cloud and Taiwanese.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2002, 2005—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Wind, Cloud and Taiwanese providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Wind and Cloud”, the useful work is to connect “taiwanese TV series released in 2002” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q8023959. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2002 and 2005.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Wind and Cloud”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Wind and Cloud primary sources, Wind and Cloud archive and Wind research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Wind and Cloud”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Wind and Cloud” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.