CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

William Skipton

19th century Priest in Ireland

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 11, 2025
Entity authorityQ56255546 ↗
Source-derived summary

William Skipton (5 November 1831 – 20 April 1903) was an Anglican priest in Ireland during the second half of the 19th century and the first decade of the 20th.

Skipton was born in County Londonderry and educated at Trinity College, Dublin. He was ordained in 1856; and was Dean of Killala from 1885 until his death.

Editorial summary

“William Skipton” enters the record as 19th century Priest in Ireland. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what William, Skipton and 19th can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1831, 1903, 1856, 1885—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1831-11-05. Its strongest next move is a source search built around William, Skipton and 19th.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“William Skipton” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, William, Skipton and 19th provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 11, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q56255546. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1831, 1903, 1856 and 1885.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “William Skipton”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow William Skipton primary sources, William Skipton archive and William research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “William Skipton”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “William Skipton” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.