William Rushworth (priest)
English Roman Catholic priest
William Rushworth (died 1637), or William Richworth, was an English Roman Catholic priest and controversialist.
Biography
Rushworth was a native of Lincolnshire. He received his education in the English College at Douay, where he went by the name of Charles Ross. He was ordained priest on 29 September 1615, and on 8 March 1617–18 he undertook the office of general prefect, which he resigned on 18 August 1618. Soon afterwards he was sent to the mission in England, where he died in 1637. His anonymous biographer says: "He was a man curious in divinity, controversies, mathematicks, and physick, but chiefly delighted in mathematics, and, by the name of Robinson, entertained correspondence with the learned Oughtred."
Rushworth left in manuscript a work which was published under the title of "The Dialogves of William Richworth; or, the iudgmend [sic] of common sense in the choise of Religion," Paris (John Mestais), 1640 (12mo, pp. 582; reprinted, Paris, 1648, 12mo). Another edition, corrected and enlarged by the Rev. Thomas White, who added a fourth dialogue, is entitled: "Rushworth's Dialogues. Or the Judgment of common sence in the choyce of Religion," Paris, 1654, 8vo, pp.
The public source identifies “William Rushworth (priest)” as english Roman Catholic priest. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around William, Rushworth and priest.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “William Rushworth (priest)”, the useful work is to connect “english Roman Catholic priest” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q21400352. VIAF identifies the subject as 29879332. The Library of Congress control number is n85086662. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1637, 1615, 1617 and 1618.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “William Rushworth (priest)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow William Rushworth (priest) primary sources, William Rushworth (priest) archive and William research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “William Rushworth (priest)”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “William Rushworth (priest)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.