CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

William L. Eagleton

American diplomat (1926-2011)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ8014161 ↗
Source-derived summary

William Lester Eagleton Jr. (August 17, 1926 – January 27, 2011) was a United States Foreign Service Officer and diplomat who served as Ambassador to several Middle Eastern and North African states.

Early life

Born in Peoria, Illinois, Eagleton served in the United States Navy from 1944 to 1946, and graduated from Yale University in 1948. He joined the U.S. foreign service in 1949.

Diplomatic career

Eagleton served as American consul in Tabriz, Iran between 1959 and 1961 and Chargé d’Affaires ad interim to Yemen 1967, Algeria 1969-1974, Tunisia 1977, and Libya 1978–1980, as well as Principal Officer in Iraq 1980–1984 and United States Ambassador to Syria 1984–1988. He is also an author of The Kurdish Republic of 1946 (1961) and "Iraqi Kurdistan" in The World Today (1956).

After his term as Ambassador to Syria ended in 1988, Eagleton worked with the United Nations as Deputy Commissioner-General for Palestinian Refugees (1988–94), Special Coordinator for Sarajevo (1994–1996), and Director of UN Operations in Western Sahara (1999–2001). He rejoined the State Department in 2003 as a special advisor for Northern Iraq.

Eagleton died in Peoria in 2011, aged 84.

Textile publications

Eagleton's 1988 book An Introduction to Kurdish Rugs drew from his experience collecting rugs in Baghdad and elsewhere in the Middle East.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “William L. Eagleton” as american diplomat (1926-2011). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around William, Eagleton and American.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1926, 2011, 1944, 1946—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1926-08-17, 1926-01-01—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with William, Eagleton and American providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “William L. Eagleton”, the useful work is to connect “american diplomat (1926-2011)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q8014161. VIAF identifies the subject as 53220458. The Library of Congress control number is n87909665. 4 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1926, 2011, 1944 and 1946.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “William L. Eagleton”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow William L. Eagleton primary sources, William L. Eagleton archive and William research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “William L. Eagleton”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “William L. Eagleton” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.