CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Willem Drew

Australian footballer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ62398236
Source-derived summary

Willem Drew (born 1 October 1998) is a professional Australian rules footballer who plays for the Port Adelaide Football Club in the Australian Football League (AFL). He was recruited by Port Adelaide with the 33rd draft pick in the 2016 AFL draft. He is the cousin of former Essendon player Martin Gleeson, and the nephew of Adrian Gleeson.

AFL career

Drew made his AFL debut in Port Adelaide's win over Melbourne in the opening round of the 2019 AFL season.

Statistics

Updated to the end of round 22, 2026.

Editorial summary

“Willem Drew” enters the record as australian footballer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Willem, Drew and Australian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1998, 2016, 2019, 2026—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1998-10-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Willem, Drew and Australian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Willem Drew” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Willem, Drew and Australian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q62398236. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1998, 2016, 2019 and 2026.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Willem Drew”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Willem Drew primary sources, Willem Drew archive and Willem research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Willem Drew”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Willem Drew” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.