Modularity theorem
theorem in mathematics

In number theory, the modularity theorem states that elliptic curves over the field of rational numbers are related to modular forms in a particular way. Andrew Wiles and Richard Taylor proved the modularity theorem for semistable elliptic curves, which was enough to imply Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT). Later, a series of papers by Wiles's former students Brian Conrad, Fred Diamond and Richard Taylor, culminating in a joint paper with Christophe Breuil, extended Wiles's techniques to prove the full modularity theorem in 2001. Before that, the statement was known as the Taniyama–Shimura conjecture, Taniyama–Shimura–Weil conjecture, or the modularity conjecture for elliptic curves.
Statement
The theorem states that any elliptic curve over
Q
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} }
can be obtained via a rational map with integer coefficients from the classical modular curve X0(N) for some integer N; this is a curve with integer coefficients with an explicit definition. This mapping is called a modular parametrization of level N. If N is the smallest integer for which such a parametrization can be found (which by the modularity theorem itself is now known to be a number called the conductor), then the parametrization may be defined in terms of a mapping generated by a particular kind of modular form of weight two and level N, a normalized newform with integer q-expansion, followed if need be by an isogeny.
Related statements
The modularity theorem implies a closely related analytic statement:
To each elliptic curve E over
Q
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} }
we may attach a corresponding L-series. The L-series is a Dirichlet series, commonly written
L
(
E
,
s
)
=
∑
n
=
1
∞
a
n
n
s
.
{\displaystyle L(E,s)=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {a_{n}}{n^{s}}}.}
The generating function of the coefficients an is then
f
(
E
,
q
)
=
∑
n
=
1
∞
a
n
q
n
.
{\displaystyle f(E,q)=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }a_{n}q^{n}.}
If we make the substitution
q
=
e
2
π
i
τ
{\displaystyle q=e^{2\pi i\tau }}
we see that we have written the Fourier expansion of a function f(E,τ) of the complex variable τ, so the coefficients of the q-series are also thought of as the Fourier coefficients of f.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Modularity theorem” as theorem in mathematics. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as theorem in mathematics. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q649469. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2001.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Modularity theorem”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Modularity theorem primary sources, Modularity theorem archive and Modularity research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Modularity theorem”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Modularity theorem” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.