Wie is de Mol? (Dutch TV series) season 10
season of television series
The tenth season of the Dutch TV series Wie is de Mol? ("Who is the Mole?") aired in the winter of 2010. Pieter Jan Hagens returned to host for his third season, with guest appearances from former hosts, Angela Groothuizen and Karel van der Graaf. The season took place in Japan, marking the fourth time the series has filmed in Asia, after Bali in season 5, Thailand in season 7 and Jordan in season 9. The season premiered on January 7, 2010. The Reunion aired on March 25, 2010 where Frits Sissing was declared the winner of the season, earning a grand total of €21,950.-. Sissing was faster in completing the final test than his runner-up Sanne Vogel, to successfully unmasked Kim Pieters as the Mole of 2010.
Format
Followed the same format as its Belgian predecessor, ten Dutch celebrities travel to Japan to complete Assignments to earn money for the group pot. However, one of the ten is the titular Mole, the one designated to sabotage the assignments and cause the group to earn the least amount of money for the winner's pot as possible. Every few days, players would take a 20-question multiple choice test about the identity of the Mole.
The public source identifies “Wie is de Mol? (Dutch TV series) season 10” as season of television series. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Dutch, series and season.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Wie is de Mol? (Dutch TV series) season 10”, the useful work is to connect “season of television series” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q104843151. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010.
Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.
- Identifying works and editions
- Tracing reception history
- Finding collection records
The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Wie is de Mol? (Dutch TV series) season 10”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Wie is de Mol? (Dutch TV series) season 10 primary sources, Wie is de Mol? (Dutch TV series) season 10 archive and Dutch research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Wie is de Mol? (Dutch TV series) season 10”?
- How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
- Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Wie is de Mol? (Dutch TV series) season 10” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.