Santic–Wibatech
German cycling team
Santic–Wibatech is a German UCI Continental team founded in 2012. It participates in UCI Continental Circuits races. The team was formerly registered in Poland.
Team roster
As of 6 December 2022.
Major wins
2013
Stage 4 Carpathian Couriers Race U23, Paweł Franczak
2015
Stage 4 Szlakiem Grodòw Piastowskich, Sylwester Janiszewski
2016
Visegrad 4 Bicycle Race, Marek Rutkiewicz
Stage 1 Tour of Małopolska, Dariusz Batek
2018
Visegrad 4 Bicycle Race–GP Slovakia, Maciej Paterski
Visegrad 4 Bicycle Race–GP Poland, Maciej Paterski
Overall Tour of Estonia, Grzegorz Stępniak
Stage 1 Tour of Małopolska, Maciej Paterski
Overall Course Cycliste de Solidarnosc et des Champions Olympiques, Sylwester Janiszewski
1st Stages 1 & 5, Sylwester Janiszewski
Puchar Uzdrowisk Karpackich, Maciej Paterski
Minsk Cup, Maciej Paterski
Grand Prix Judendorf-Straßengel, Maciej Paterski
2019
Stage 3 Circuit des Ardennes International, Maciej Paterski
Prologue Carpathian Couriers Race, Marceli Bogusławski
Stages 2 & 3 CCC Tour – Grody Piastowskie, Maciej Paterski
Overall Wyscig Mjr.
The public source identifies “Santic–Wibatech” as german cycling team. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Santic, Wibatech and German.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Santic–Wibatech”, the useful work is to connect “german cycling team” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q9355991. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2012, 2022, 2013 and 2015.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Santic–Wibatech”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Santic–Wibatech primary sources, Santic–Wibatech archive and Santic research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Santic–Wibatech”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Santic–Wibatech” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.