White Ridge Quartzite
geologic formation in New Mexico, US
The White Ridge Quartzite is a geologic formation in central New Mexico. It has a maximum age of 1650 million years (Ma), corresponding to the Statherian period.
History of investigation
The unit was first defined by Stark and Dapples in 1946, during their mapping of the Los Pinos Mountains, and named for White Ridge, a prominent ridge in the northeastern part of the mountains.
Geology
The unit is a thick sequence of massive quartzite beds, white to reddish or tan in color, 2 to 7 feet (0.6 to 2 m) thick. There are also scattered beds of sericite schist that become more numerous in the uppermost part of the formation, where the quartzite beds thin to 1 to 2 feet (0.3 to 0.6 m) in thickness and the beds are reddened by hematite. The quartzite often contains significant sericite, biotite, and hematite. The total thickness of the formation is up to 3,700 feet (1,100 m). The beds dip steeply to the west, at a dip angle of 32 to 70 degrees. The formation overlies the Abajo Formation and in turn is overlain by the Estadio Schist.
Detrital zircon grains in the formation are almost identical in age and isotope composition to the underlying Sevilleta metarhyolite, suggesting that the sediments of the quartzite were weathered almost exclusively from local sources.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “White Ridge Quartzite” is geologic formation in New Mexico, US. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through White, Ridge and Quartzite, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “geologic formation in New Mexico, US” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 6, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q111940761. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1650 and 1946.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “White Ridge Quartzite”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow White Ridge Quartzite primary sources, White Ridge Quartzite archive and White research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “White Ridge Quartzite”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “White Ridge Quartzite” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.