CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

What Is to Be Done?

1902 pamphlet by Lenin that argues for a vanguard to spread Marxism since workers do not spontaneously become political by fighting economic battles, which precipitated the Bolshevik–Menshevik split

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ946877 ↗
Source-derived summary

What Is to Be Done? Burning Questions of Our Movement is a political pamphlet written by Vladimir Lenin (credited as N. Lenin) in 1901 and published in March 1902. He previewed the work in a May 1901 Iskra article, "Where to Begin", which he called "a skeleton plan to be developed in greater detail in a pamphlet now in preparation for print". The title of What Is to Be Done? was taken from an 1863 novel of the same name by Russian revolutionary Nikolai Chernyshevsky.

The booklet's central focus is the ideological formation of the proletariat. Lenin argues that the working class will not become politically advanced simply by fighting economic battles against employers over wages, hours, and the like. To imbue the working class with Marxist principles, he recommends a cadre of dedicated revolutionaries form a vanguard political party that can teach Marxism to workers.

The legacy of What Is to Be Done? has been much debated.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “What Is to Be Done?” as 1902 pamphlet by Lenin that argues for a vanguard to spread Marxism since workers do not spontaneously become political by fighting economic battles, which precipitated the Bolshevik–Menshevik split. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around What, Done and pamphlet.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1901, 1902, 1863—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1901, 1902-03-01—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with What, Done and pamphlet providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “What Is to Be Done?”, the useful work is to connect “1902 pamphlet by Lenin that argues for a vanguard to spread Marxism since workers do not spontaneously become political by fighting economic battles, which precipitated the Bolshevik–Menshevik split” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q946877. VIAF identifies the subject as 185103722. The Library of Congress control number is n84067953. None of the 4 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1901, 1902 and 1863.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “What Is to Be Done?”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow What Is to Be Done? primary sources, What Is to Be Done? archive and What research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “What Is to Be Done?”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “What Is to Be Done?” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.