CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Daniel Wermelinger

football referee, Financial advisor

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 8, 2021
Entity authorityQ1163127 ↗
Source-derived summary

Daniel Wermelinger (born 18 March 1971) is a Swiss football referee.

Born in Aarau, Wermelinger completed his training to referee in the lower Swiss Leagues in 1987. He has been member of the SSV-ASA (Swiss Referee Association) since 2005. The match FC Basel against FC Schaffhausen on 22 July 2006 was his first game as referee in the Swiss Super League.

He is president of the SR-Union (Swiss Referees Union).

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Daniel Wermelinger” as football referee, Financial advisor. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Daniel, Wermelinger and football.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1971, 1987, 2005, 2006—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1971-03-18. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Daniel, Wermelinger and football providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Daniel Wermelinger”, the useful work is to connect “football referee, Financial advisor” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 8, 2021. The linked authority identifier is Q1163127. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1971, 1987, 2005 and 2006.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Daniel Wermelinger”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Daniel Wermelinger primary sources, Daniel Wermelinger archive and Daniel research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Daniel Wermelinger”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Daniel Wermelinger” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.