Weakly compact cardinal
Mahlo cardinal 𝜅 such that every height‐𝜅 tree either has a size‐𝜅 level or a size‐𝜅 branch

In mathematics, a weakly compact cardinal is a certain kind of cardinal number introduced by Erdős & Tarski (1961); weakly compact cardinals are large cardinals, meaning that their existence cannot be proven from the standard axioms of set theory. (Tarski originally called them "not strongly incompact" cardinals.)
Formally, a cardinal κ is defined to be weakly compact if it is uncountable and for every function f: [κ] 2 → {0, 1} there is a set of cardinality κ that is homogeneous for f. In this context, [κ] 2 means the set of 2-element subsets of κ, and a subset S of κ is homogeneous for f if either all of [S]2 maps to 0 or all of it maps to 1.
The name "weakly compact" refers to the fact that if a cardinal is weakly compact then a certain related infinitary language satisfies a version of the compactness theorem; see below.
Equivalent formulations
The following are equivalent for any uncountable cardinal κ:
κ is weakly compact.
for every λ<κ, natural number n ≥ 2, and function f: [κ]n → λ, there is a set of cardinality κ that is homogeneous for f. (Drake 1974, chapter 7 theorem 3.5)
κ is inaccessible and has the tree property, that is, every tree of height κ has either a level of size κ or a branch of size κ.
Every linear order of cardinality κ has an ascending or a descending sequence of order type κ. (W. W. Comfort, S. Negrepontis, The Theory of Ultrafilters, p.185)
κ is
Π
1
1
{\displaystyle \Pi _{1}^{1}}
-indescribable.
κ has the extension property.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Weakly compact cardinal” is mahlo cardinal 𝜅 such that every height‐𝜅 tree either has a size‐𝜅 level or a size‐𝜅 branch. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Weakly, compact and cardinal, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “mahlo cardinal 𝜅 such that every height‐𝜅 tree either has a size‐𝜅 level or a size‐𝜅 branch” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2905392. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1961 and 1974.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Weakly compact cardinal”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Weakly compact cardinal primary sources, Weakly compact cardinal archive and Weakly research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Weakly compact cardinal”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Weakly compact cardinal” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.