CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

We R Are Why

1996 single by Autechre

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 2, 2025
Entity authorityQ3566929
Source-derived summary

"We R Are Why" is an Autechre 12-inch single released by mail-order and available at some concerts, by Warp Records in 1996. It was written and produced by Rob Brown and Sean Booth.

Sean Booth:"we r are why were the first two tracks we did on the ry30

they're both entirely done in the ry30 – with a bit of fx on the diff channels maybe, can't rem"

Track listing

There is intentionally no speed listed on the release. In an "AAA (Ask Autechre Anything)" on the site WATMM (We Are The Music Makers), Sean Booth stated "our original intention [was] to not write it on the record". The durations above were measured when the vinyl was played at 45 rpm.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “We R Are Why” is 1996 single by Autechre. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through single and Autechre, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1996—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1996-04-14. For this dossier, single and Autechre is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “1996 single by Autechre” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 2, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3566929. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1996.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “We R Are Why”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow We R Are Why primary sources, We R Are Why archive and single research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “We R Are Why”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from We R Are Why” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.