CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Waterford, Indiana

unincorporated community in LaPorte County, Indiana

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ7973989 ↗
Source-derived summary

Waterford is an unincorporated community in Coolspring Township, LaPorte County, Indiana, United States.

History

A post office was located in Waterford between 1850 and 1900. The community grew around a gristmill.

Notable people

John Rarick – U.S. Representative (1924–2009) from Louisiana was born in Waterford.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Waterford, Indiana” as unincorporated community in LaPorte County, Indiana. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Waterford, Indiana and unincorporated.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1850, 1900, 1924, 2009—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Waterford, Indiana and unincorporated providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Waterford, Indiana”, the useful work is to connect “unincorporated community in LaPorte County, Indiana” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7973989. Authority coordinates are 41.671, -86.845. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1850, 1900, 1924 and 2009.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Waterford, Indiana”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Waterford, Indiana primary sources, Waterford, Indiana archive and Waterford research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Waterford, Indiana”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Waterford, Indiana” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.