CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Tetraroginae

family of fishes

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ2584482
Source-derived summary

Tetraroginae is a subfamily of marine ray-finned fishes, commonly known as waspfishes or sailback scorpionfishes, belonging to the family Scorpaenidae, the scorpionfishes and their relatives. These fishes are native to the Indian Ocean and the West Pacific. As their name suggests, waspfishes are often venomous; having poison glands on their spines. They are bottom-dwelling fish, living at depths to 300 metres (980 ft). These creatures usually live in hiding places on the sea bottom.

Taxonomy and etymology

Tetraroginae, or Tetrarogidae, was first formally recognised as a taxonomic grouping in 1949 by the South African ichthyologist J. L. B. Smith. The 5th edition of Fishes of the World treats this as a subfamily of the scorpionfish family Scorpaenidae, however other authorities treat it as a valid family, the Tetrarogidae. A recent study placed the waspfishes into an expanded stonefish clade, within the family Synanceiidae, because all of these fish have a lachrymal sabre that can project a switch-blade-like mechanism out from underneath their eye.

The name of the subfamily is based on the genus name Tetraroge, which was described in 1860 by Albert Günther and its name means "four clefts", an allusion to the four clfts in the gills in comparison to the five clefts in the gills of Pentaroge, now regarded as a synonym of Gymnapistes.

Genera

The following genera are classified within the subfamily Tetraroginae:

Genus Ablabys Kaup, 1873

Genus Centropogon Gunther, 1860

Genus Coccotropsis Barnard, 1927

Genus Cottapistus Bleeker, 1876

Genus Glyptauchen Gunther, 1860

Genus Gymnapistes Swainson, 1839

Genus Liocranium Ogilby, 1903

Genus Neocentropogon Matsubara, 1943

Genus Neovespicula Mandrytsa, 2001

Genus Notesthes Ogilby, 1903

Genus Ocosia Jordan & Starks, 1904

Genus Paracentropogon Bleeker, 1876

Genus Pseudovespicula Mandrytsa, 2001

Genus Richardsonichthys J. L. B. Smith, 1958

Genus Snyderina Jordan & Starks, 1901

Genus Tetraroge Gunther, 1860

Genus Vespicula Jordan & Richardson, 1910

The genus Vespicula is not universally recognised, its type species is Apistus trachinoides, which some workers have placed in the monotypic genus Trichosomus Swainson, 1839 with the two remaining species being classified within the genus Pseudovespicula.

Editorial summary

“Tetraroginae” enters the record as family of fishes. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Tetraroginae, family and fishes can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1949, 1860, 1873, 1927—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Tetraroginae, family and fishes.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Tetraroginae” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Tetraroginae, family and fishes provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2584482. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1949, 1860, 1873 and 1927.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Tetraroginae”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Tetraroginae primary sources, Tetraroginae archive and Tetraroginae research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tetraroginae”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Tetraroginae” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.