CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Wangcun Township, Nanyang, Henan

township in Henan, People's Republic of China

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 10, 2021
Entity authorityQ2117228 ↗
Source-derived summary

Wangcun (Chinese: 王村; pinyin: Wángcūn) is a township in Wolong District, Nanyang, Henan, People's Republic of China, located in the western suburbs of Nanyang along China National Highway 312 (G312) just east of the G312 interchange with G55 Erenhot–Guangzhou Expressway. As of 2011, it has 12 villages under its administration.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Wangcun Township, Nanyang, Henan” is township in Henan, People's Republic of China. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Wangcun, Township and Nanyang, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Wangcun, Township and Nanyang is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “township in Henan, People's Republic of China” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 10, 2021. The linked authority identifier is Q2117228. Authority coordinates are 33.017, 112.412. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2011.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Wangcun Township, Nanyang, Henan”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Wangcun Township, Nanyang, Henan primary sources, Wangcun Township, Nanyang, Henan archive and Wangcun research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Wangcun Township, Nanyang, Henan”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Wangcun Township, Nanyang, Henan” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.