CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Phillip Waipuldanya Roberts

Australian traditional doctor (1922–1988)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ28355689
Source-derived summary

Phillip Waipuldanya Roberts (1922 – 24 November 1988) was a traditional doctor, activist and adviser to the Commonwealth Government of Australia on Aboriginal policies and programs.

Early life

Roberts was born south of the Roper River in the country of the Alawa people. He was the eldest son of Barnabas Gabarla, a former drover, stockman and saddler who became an evangelist for Roper River Mission. He is the brother of Mercia Butler and Silas Ngulati Roberts.

Roberts received a primary school education from the mission and became a motor mechanic.

Working life

In 1953, he went to Urapunga Station to repair a marine engine and met Dr WA (Spike) Langsford of the Department of Health accompanying him on a survey of the Victoria River District. He then worked as a medical assistant for the department and became well known for seeking out Aboriginal people in remote areas with leprosy, encouraging them to come to Darwin for treatment. It earned him the title of 'Leper Hunter'. Queen Elizabeth II visited Roberts on her 1963 visit to Darwin.

In 1969 he was selected as one of only three advisers for the Council of Aboriginal Affairs established after the 1967 Referendum.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Phillip Waipuldanya Roberts” as australian traditional doctor (1922–1988). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Phillip, Waipuldanya and Roberts.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1922, 1988, 1953, 1963—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1922. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Phillip, Waipuldanya and Roberts providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Phillip Waipuldanya Roberts”, the useful work is to connect “australian traditional doctor (1922–1988)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q28355689. VIAF identifies the subject as 296463299. The Library of Congress control number is nr90028990. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1922, 1988, 1953 and 1963.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Phillip Waipuldanya Roberts”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Phillip Waipuldanya Roberts primary sources, Phillip Waipuldanya Roberts archive and Phillip research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Phillip Waipuldanya Roberts”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Phillip Waipuldanya Roberts” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.