CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Wadard

anglo-Norman nobleman

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ2962995
Source-derived summary

Wadard was an 11th-century Norman nobleman who is mentioned in the Domesday Book of 1086, and is depicted in the Bayeux Tapestry.

Wadard was a noble who travelled to England in 1066 with Duke William of Normandy. He is depicted and named in the Bayeux Tapestry on a foraging expedition, and may have been in the logistics section of William's army. His portrait suggests that he held a senior rank.

In the Domesday Book, Wadard is recorded as a tenant of Odo, bishop of Bayeux, holding estates amounting to about 1,260 acres in Kent and elsewhere, and providing him with an income of around £127. His holdings included Farningham, Combe, and six houses in Dover, in Kent; Cassington, Thrupp, Cogges, and Little Tew in Oxfordshire, Thames Ditton in Surrey; and Glentham in Lincolnshire.

The 14th-century chronicler William Thorne states that Scolland, Abbot of St Augustine's Abbey granted Wadard certain land in Northbourne, Kent for life, on condition that "he pay every year on the feast of Pentecost the sum of 30 shillings, together with a tenth part of everything he derived from the land".

He is recorded as a witness to a land grant to the Abbey of Saint-Pierre de Préaux in Normandy, and he was also a tenant of St Augustine's Abbey.

Family

His son Rainald held two estates from Odo at Somerton and Fritwell, adjoining his father's estate at Fringford.

Two other sons, named Martin and Simon, are mentioned in the cartulary of the Abbey of Préaux.

Editorial summary

“Wadard” enters the record as anglo-Norman nobleman. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Wadard, anglo-Norman and nobleman can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1086, 1066—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Wadard, anglo-Norman and nobleman.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Wadard” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Wadard, anglo-Norman and nobleman provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2962995. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1086 and 1066.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Wadard”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Wadard primary sources, Wadard archive and Wadard research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Wadard”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Wadard” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.