CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

WWE Breaking Point

2009 World Wrestling Entertainment pay-per-view event

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ1058847
Source-derived summary

Breaking Point was a 2009 professional wrestling pay-per-view (PPV) event produced by the American company World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE). It took place on September 13, 2009, at the Bell Centre in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and was held for wrestlers from the promotion's Raw, SmackDown, and ECW brand divisions. The theme of the event was that each main event match was contested under submission or surrender rules.

In the main events, CM Punk retained SmackDown's World Heavyweight Championship against The Undertaker in a submission match, John Cena won Raw's WWE Championship from Randy Orton in an "I Quit" match, and in a bout from Raw, The Legacy (Cody Rhodes and Ted DiBiase Jr.) defeated D-Generation X (Triple H and Shawn Michaels) in a Submissions Count Anywhere match. Also on the card, Unified WWE Tag Team Champions Jeri-Show (Chris Jericho and Big Show) defeated Montel Vontavious Porter and Mark Henry, Kofi Kingston successfully defended Raw's United States Championship against The Miz, Kane defeated The Great Khali in a Singapore Cane match, and Christian successfully defended the ECW Championship against William Regal.

Breaking Point replaced WWE's previously annual September event, Unforgiven; however, it was a one-off event, as the September slot was in turn replaced by Night of Champions in 2010, which was moved back from its previous July slot. The Breaking Point name was later used for the submission system included in the WWE '12 video game and some of its sequels. The event had 169,000 pay-per-view buys, down from the Unforgiven 2008 figure of 211,000 buys.

Production

Background

In May 2009, the American professional wrestling promotion World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) ran a poll on their website in which fans could vote on the name for that year's September pay-per-view (PPV) event, which would replace the company's previously annual September event, Unforgiven. Breaking Point was chosen over Submission Sunday, Total Submission, and Submit & Quit, and the concept was that each main event match would be contested under submission or surrender rules.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “WWE Breaking Point” as 2009 World Wrestling Entertainment pay-per-view event. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2009, 2010, 2008—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2009. The account is most persuasive where Breaking, Point and World can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as 2009 World Wrestling Entertainment pay-per-view event. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1058847. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2009, 2010 and 2008.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “WWE Breaking Point”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow WWE Breaking Point primary sources, WWE Breaking Point archive and Breaking research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “WWE Breaking Point”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from WWE Breaking Point” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.