CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Weekly Playboy

Weekly men's magazine published by Shūeisha in Japan

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ1138450 ↗
Source-derived summary

Weekly Playboy (Japanese: 週刊プレイボーイ, Hepburn: Shūkan Pureibōi), also known as Shūpure (週プレ) or WPB, is a Japanese weekly magazine published by Shueisha since 1966. Although the magazine publishes a variety of news and special interest articles, columns, celebrity interviews, and manga, it is considered an adult magazine. The target demographic is men, and each issue features several partially nude pictorials of female models.

This magazine is not a regional edition of the American Playboy magazine; the Japanese edition of that magazine was published as Monthly Playboy (MPB) by Shueisha until its cancellation in January 2009.

Manga in WPB

Circuit no Ōkami II: Modena no Tsurugi by Satoshi Ikezawa

Lady Snowblood (修羅雪姫) by Kazuo Koike and Kazuo Kamimura

Modena no Ken (モデナの剣) by Satoshi Ikezawa

My Favorite Carrera (彼女のカレラ) by Kia Asamiya

Ore no Sora (俺の空) by Hiroshi Motomiya

Polo Shirt and Upper Cut by Norifusa Mita

The First President of Japan by Yoshiki Hidaka and Ryuji Tsugihara

Taiyō no Makibaō by Tsunomaru

Ultimate Muscle by Yudetamago

Beat Shot!! by Satoshi Ikezawa

Sakigake!! Otokojuku by Akira Miyashita

References

External links

Weekly Playboy Online

"雑誌 (Magazines)". tisen.jp (in Japanese). Retrieved 26 September 2011. (Lists appearances in Weekly Playboy from 1966 to 2011.

Editorial summary

“Weekly Playboy” enters the record as weekly men's magazine published by Shūeisha in Japan. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Weekly, Playboy and men's can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1966, 2009, 2011—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2001. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Weekly, Playboy and men's.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Weekly Playboy” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Weekly, Playboy and men's provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1138450. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1966, 2009 and 2011.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Weekly Playboy”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Weekly Playboy primary sources, Weekly Playboy archive and Weekly research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Weekly Playboy”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Weekly Playboy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.