CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

WISArD experiment

experimental setup at CERN

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 3, 2025
Entity authorityQ122144181
Source-derived summary

The Weak Interaction Studies with 32Ar Decay (WISArD) experiment is a permanent experimental setup located in the ISOLDE facility, at CERN. The purpose of the experiment is to investigate the weak interaction by looking for beta-delayed protons emitted from a nucleus. In the absence of online isotope production during Long Shutdown 2, the experimental setup has also been used to measure the shape of the beta energy spectrum. A goal of the experiment is to search for physics beyond the Standard Model (SM) by expanding the existing limits on currents in the weak interaction.

The WISArD experimental setup reutilises the WITCH experiment's superconducting magnet and existing infrastructure.

Background

The Standard Model describes three of the four fundamental interactions and classifies all known elementary particles. Whilst being essentially confirmed by the discovery of the Higgs boson, there are still many unanswered questions, specifically regarding the weak interaction. The Standard Model proposes a specific Vector – Axial Vector (V – A) formalism for the weak interaction, however other contributions are not excluded by theory. Measurements of well-selected beta decays, such as pure Fermi (F) or pure Gamow-Teller (GT) decays, may provide experimental evidence for these other contributions, as beta decays cause minimal disturbances from effects relating to nuclear structure and the pure transitions are independent of underlying nuclear interactions.

By determining the momentum of the beta particle and the neutrino, a correlation coefficient that quantifies the extent of non-SM contributions can be determined. However, it is essentially impossible to observe and measure the neutrino in this kind of experiment.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “WISArD experiment” is experimental setup at CERN. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through WISArD, experiment and experimental, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 257-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, WISArD, experiment and experimental is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “experimental setup at CERN” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 3, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q122144181. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “WISArD experiment”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow WISArD experiment primary sources, WISArD experiment archive and WISArD research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “WISArD experiment”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from WISArD experiment” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.