WISArD experiment
experimental setup at CERN

The Weak Interaction Studies with 32Ar Decay (WISArD) experiment is a permanent experimental setup located in the ISOLDE facility, at CERN. The purpose of the experiment is to investigate the weak interaction by looking for beta-delayed protons emitted from a nucleus. In the absence of online isotope production during Long Shutdown 2, the experimental setup has also been used to measure the shape of the beta energy spectrum. A goal of the experiment is to search for physics beyond the Standard Model (SM) by expanding the existing limits on currents in the weak interaction.
The WISArD experimental setup reutilises the WITCH experiment's superconducting magnet and existing infrastructure.
Background
The Standard Model describes three of the four fundamental interactions and classifies all known elementary particles. Whilst being essentially confirmed by the discovery of the Higgs boson, there are still many unanswered questions, specifically regarding the weak interaction. The Standard Model proposes a specific Vector – Axial Vector (V – A) formalism for the weak interaction, however other contributions are not excluded by theory. Measurements of well-selected beta decays, such as pure Fermi (F) or pure Gamow-Teller (GT) decays, may provide experimental evidence for these other contributions, as beta decays cause minimal disturbances from effects relating to nuclear structure and the pure transitions are independent of underlying nuclear interactions.
By determining the momentum of the beta particle and the neutrino, a correlation coefficient that quantifies the extent of non-SM contributions can be determined. However, it is essentially impossible to observe and measure the neutrino in this kind of experiment.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “WISArD experiment” is experimental setup at CERN. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through WISArD, experiment and experimental, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “experimental setup at CERN” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 3, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q122144181. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “WISArD experiment”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow WISArD experiment primary sources, WISArD experiment archive and WISArD research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “WISArD experiment”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “WISArD experiment” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.