CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

WAFLEX

Model of rivers

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 20, 2023
Entity authorityQ7946385
Source-derived summary

WAFLEX is a spreadsheet-based model. It can be used to analyse upstream-downstream interactions, dam management options and water allocation and development options.

Structure of the Model

WAFLEX is set up as a network, where each cell is river reach, demand node or reservoir. Each cell contains a simple formula to add water flowing into it from adjacent cells, and to subtract any demand connected to that cell. The network is set up twice, in demand mode and in supply mode.

The inputs to WAFLEX are:

river inflow time series - source area of where the model starts

demand node time series, e.g. a settlement water supply

reservoir rule curves and dimensions

time series from gauges for calibration

The outputs of WAFLEX are:

time series for specified points on the rivers - these can be calibrated against gauges

time series of abstractions and shortages for each demand node

time series of reservoir levels

Code can be readily added to generate the above outputs graphically.

Application

WAFLEX has been applied extensively, especially in southern Africa and South America, including for:

Water allocation: between Eswatini, South Africa and Mozambique on the transboundary Inkomati River, in the Conapu Basin in Trinidad, in the Thuli Basin, Zimbabwe, and to model shortages and water allocation in the middle Heihe River in China.

Modelling environmental flow requirements of the Odzi River in Zimbabwe.

Modelling conjunctive use of groundwater and interbasin transfers in the North China Plain

Water quality modelling and mass balance of the Jubones River in Ecuador and the Kafue River in Zambia.

Editorial summary

“WAFLEX” enters the record as model of rivers. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what WAFLEX, Model and rivers can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 257-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around WAFLEX, Model and rivers.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“WAFLEX” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, WAFLEX, Model and rivers provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 20, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q7946385. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “WAFLEX”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow WAFLEX primary sources, WAFLEX archive and WAFLEX research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “WAFLEX”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from WAFLEX” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.