CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

15 and 290 theorems

theorem

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ780763 ↗
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, the 15 theorem or Conway–Schneeberger Fifteen Theorem, proved by John H. Conway and W. A. Schneeberger in 1993, states that if a positive definite quadratic form arising from an integer matrix represents all positive integers up to 15, then it represents all positive integers.

Conway and Schneeberger chose not to publish their proof because Manjul Bhargava found a simpler proof, published in 2000.

Conway conjectured an analogous statement for integral quadratic forms, with the constant 15 replaced by 290.

Bhargava and Jonathan Hanke have a 2011 preprint

with a proof of this "290 conjecture", but as of 2026 it has not been published, and the code containing the computations needed for the proof is no longer available at the URL listed in their preprint.

Details

Suppose

Q

i

j

{\displaystyle Q_{ij}}

is a symmetric matrix with real entries. For any vector

x

{\displaystyle x}

with integer components, define

Q

(

x

)

=

x

t

Q

x

=

∑

i

,

j

x

i

Q

i

j

x

j

{\displaystyle Q(x)=x^{t}Qx=\sum _{i,j}x_{i}Q_{ij}x_{j}}

This function is called a quadratic form. We say

Q

{\displaystyle Q}

is positive definite if

Q

(

x

)

>

0

{\displaystyle Q(x)>0}

whenever

x

≠

0

{\displaystyle x\neq 0}

. If

Q

(

x

)

{\displaystyle Q(x)}

is always an integer, we call the function

Q

{\displaystyle Q}

an integral quadratic form.

We get an integral quadratic form whenever the matrix entries

Q

i

j

{\displaystyle Q_{ij}}

are integers; then

Q

{\displaystyle Q}

is said to have integer matrix. However,

Q

{\displaystyle Q}

will still be an integral quadratic form if the off-diagonal entries

Q

i

j

{\displaystyle Q_{ij}}

are integers divided by 2, while the diagonal entries are integers.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “15 and 290 theorems” as theorem. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1993, 2000, 2011, 2026—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where theorems and theorem can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as theorem. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q780763. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1993, 2000, 2011 and 2026.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “15 and 290 theorems”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 15 and 290 theorems primary sources, 15 and 290 theorems archive and theorems research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “15 and 290 theorems”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “15 and 290 theorems” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.